With just over 24 hours before the government is set to shutdown, Donald Trump and congressional leaders from both parties emerged from a high-stakes White House meeting on Monday with no agreement, setting the stage for large swaths of the federal government to close after midnight Wednesday.

The impasse came after closed-door talks between the four top congressional leaders and Trump in the Oval Office, where lawmakers appeared to trade blame but make little progress towards a deal. “There are still large differences between us,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters after the meeting, claiming that Republicans refused to engage on their core demands around health care and restoring previous funding cuts.

“Their bill has not one iota of Democratic input,” he added, taking aim at a House-passed seven-week stopgap funding bill that Senate Democrats rejected last week. “That is never how we’ve done this before.”

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the lone Democrat to vote with a majority of Republicans in favor of the bill on Sept. 19

    I think we can all safely say that Fetterman isn’t a Democrat anymore. He should be ejected from the party.

  • JHRD1880@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Good, let it shut down. Let the people know that Republicans can’t govern and will 100% abandon them to protect Trump.

  • updn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The Democrats caved to Trump the last time, they better not cave this time.

    I think that’s why Reps are gearing up for war. This could get nasty.

  • easybre_bb@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Better headline, US government will shutdown because Republicans don’t want meet Democrat request for votes that are required to keep the government open, in exchange for allowing poor people or those in terrible situations to have a functioning health coverage safety net.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let the federal government stay that way. Blue states should start picking up services where the federal government left off. And the feds don’t need their tax money, either.

  • ysjet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Time can go fuck itself for this bullshit headline. “Democrats leave White House with no deal”?

    How about “Republicans refuse Democrat deal, setting stage for Republican Government shutdown”

    Or maybe something like “Republicans Refuse To Give Americans Benefits and Medical they Pay For, Govenment Shutdown Imminent”

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is pretty obvious, the narrative has been completely captured. All news only reports what these imbeciles say. No pushback, always giving them the deference.

      This happened after 9/11 in a very pronounced way. No serious or widespread criticism was allowed in mainstream media. Although the government did apply some pressure it was mostly voluntary.

      What do you do when all the pseudo rulling institutions capitulate to a tyrant willingly? What happen when the government becomes indistinguishable from the mob?

      The answer is not much, because it has happened many times before already. People need to wake up.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Republicans don’t want a deal. Then they can make up whatever they want about democrats and claim they’re the problem and maneuver for more power grabs.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They can (and do) do that anyway. I don’t think that’s the plan here. To the halfway reasonable people, Republicans control congress. This is on them. The minority party’s job us to play hardball. To the people listening to whatever Republicans say without question, it doesn’t matter. They can make up anything they want a blame democrats. This doesn’t do anything for them.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a budget, he needs 50 votes and there’s 53 senators with a R by their names…

      If there’s a shutdown it’s cuz trump ordered it.

      Schumer “negotiating” just makes it easier for idiots to blame it on Dems.

      Mainstream media at large is acting like budget reconciliation isn’t a thing…

      The procedure overrides the Senate’s filibuster rules, which may otherwise require a sixty-vote supermajority for passage. Bills described as reconciliation bills can pass the Senate by a simple majority of fifty-one votes or fifty votes plus the vice president’s as the tie-breaker.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconciliation_(United_States_Congress)

      trump doesn’t need a single D vote in the House or Senate to pass a budget, he just doesn’t want to

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is a funding bill, which is different than the budget/reconciliation process. He needs 60 votes.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          You think “budget reconciliation” which was literally invented to make sure a budget is passed…

          Doesn’t apply to the annual budget, which has been passed by budget reconciliation for like a decade straight?

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 minutes ago

            Budget reconciliation is the bill of sale, the funding measure is the credit card. They need 60 votes to get the credit card to pay the bill. This is the only negotiation tactic the dems have in their possession. That’s why they are making their bones on the ACA funding. Tens of millions of Americans rely upon those subsidies to afford health insurance. The dems just have to make sure that the people know what’s at stake. A job they are notoriously bad at.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Did you and 14 other people just not read that?

              Senate Republicans are pushing a narrow budget resolution focused on increasing spending for immigration enforcement, national security and domestic energy production. They want to punt on dealing with Trump’s tax cuts — which expire at year’s end — until later in 2025 under a second reconciliation bill.

              It’s literally about how budget reconciliation can only be used for budget related bills…

              And the fucking annual budget is pretty obviously budget related

              • jacksilver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                From the link I provided

                An identical budget resolution must be adopted by both the House and Senate before Congress can take the critical next step: Advancing legislation to reconcile tax-and-spending laws

                My understanding is that the budget resolution needs to pass before there can be a reconciliation bill.

                Either way, if it really just required 50 votes, they would have done it already.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  My understanding is that the budget resolution needs to pass before there can be a reconciliation bill.

                  That’s about as wrong as you can be…

                  Budget reconciliation was invented specifically for the budget… The Byrd rule is what is (hypothetically) used to prevent it being used for non budgetary bills.

                  Like, it’s impressive you’re able to be so completely and utterly wrong about this, unfortunately a lot of people also don’t understand. Most likely because you’re all still just listening to CNN and other billionaire owned media conglomerates instead of just looking it up.

                  Newsflash:

                  Billionaires care more about money than people. They’re fine with a government shutdown and trump as long as profits go up.

                  They will lie to you

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          All the more reason to use it once the new fiscal year starts…

          If Schumer caves, they can abuse the rule and pass something 1000x times shittier under reconciliation.

          They were able to pass that a few months ago, because they didn’t use reconciliation for last year’s budget, it was just a CR all year

          Which is likely what will happen again, and why Schumer would be a giant fucking idiot to negotiate just so Republicans don’t have to use it.

          Like, good point, but it just brings us full circle.

          Quick edit:

          Because Senate can use reconciliation once a fiscal year

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      No he doesn’t. He needs to pay ICE agents. He needs the government to stay open.

      Shutting the government down and keeping it shut down inhibits his ability to progress with fascism.

      Shut the government down and what happens to the soldiers deployed to US streets?

      No. Shut it the fuck down. Its idiotic to allow it to stay open.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I know some things continue to operate no matter what. I don’t remember if ICE do. I’m sure border patrol continues to operate to some extent, but I have no idea to what degree. The same for the military. They still continue to some degree, but they have to scale down what jobs get done.

        This is a long way to say, yes. I agree with you. However, it won’t stop totally.

      • 0ndead@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Don’t worry, the generals are there to step in and take over any dept Trump deems necessary.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They have the majority. Should have told them to make a deal with themselves if they actually give a shit.

      But controlled opposition, doing controlled opposition things, to maintain the illusion of democracy.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Americans will never miss their water until the well runs dry.

    It’s not that Americans are all racist, or all ignorant… it’s that enough of them don’t spare a thought to think things through until it effects them personally.

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Welcome to life in America. Where intelligence and common sense aren’t so common. People will literally kill you so they can happily vote against their own interests.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Truth.

        Living in Canada is like having crazy downstairs neighbours but for some reason one of our roommates keeps inviting them upstairs.

        I have not been to the USA in a decade. Literally the only reason I’ll ever, ever, return is to visit Casa Bonita in Colorado… ideally on a layover.

            • AWTM_James@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              We sprung for the “premium seating.” It was only maybe $10 more per person, but you get seated along the diving cliff so you can see the show better. And because we were one of the last tables of the night, we got lucky and ended up with the best table in the place, right next to/above the cliff divers. I’m not really sure how best to describe it, so it’s a good thing I have video evidence 😅

              • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                fuckin eh. ty!

                but that link might doxx u eh. (can see your full name)

                oh wait just saw your username.

                sadly youtube.

        • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Omg, I tried to get in there with almost a month planning ahead. NOPE.

          You may need to find a local with whatever lifetime gold membership they sold. Bribe them to take you or something.

          I had no idea it was so difficult to get in there. I signed up for the email where they will open a few times here and there, but as soon as the mail is sent, the reservations are gobbled up by the bots.

          I wish you all the luck.

          • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s gonna be 3 years at least. I doubt I’d be getting the full experience visiting during the tariffs anyways.

            thx for the heads up!

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is true of people in general. While comfortable enough, or able to rationalize the discomfort away, people tend to not want to change. It takes a large shove to get people to act. Having a huge and diverse country with lots of built-in disconnects doesn’t help.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Having a huge and diverse country with lots of built-in disconnects doesn’t help.

        Are you saying that diversity in a disconnected society can create more opportunities for conflict?

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          24 hours ago

          It can, especially when there are systems in place to play upon those differences and fan flames, even create fires that wouldn’t naturally erupt. Diversity is powerful, but can be used for good or bad purposes.