They’re trying to claim because they were there when some or all of the vandalism occurred, and took photos of it and republished on their social media the next day, that they were in on it. Which might make sense if they weren’t a respected photojournalist.
They’re trying to claim because they were there when some or all of the vandalism occurred, and took photos of it and republished on their social media the next day, that they were in on it. Which might make sense if they weren’t a respected photojournalist.
If y’all aren’t calling friendly journos before actions you’re doing it all wrong. If a tree falls in a forest and all that.
But like, actual journalists like this one seemingly is.