return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 days agoWhite House calls Amazon ‘hostile’ for reportedly planning to list tariff costswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1975arrow-down111
arrow-up1964arrow-down1external-linkWhite House calls Amazon ‘hostile’ for reportedly planning to list tariff costswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square192fedilink
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·6 days agoIncredibly hard to source that data from the outside. Even if you can identify the suppliers, different parts of an assembly may be classified differently, even between different importers who may have partial exemptions.
minus-squaredphile@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days agoNot that they’ll do this, but Amazon should maliciously comply and hide the tariff metadata in the HTML for the browser extensions.
minus-squareTheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days agoeither way it would be free speech if an add-on or a website did it. but those days are over.
minus-squareparody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoI bet, yes, good point 💡: “Tariff GUESStimator for Amazon | Firefox”
Incredibly hard to source that data from the outside. Even if you can identify the suppliers, different parts of an assembly may be classified differently, even between different importers who may have partial exemptions.
Not that they’ll do this, but Amazon should maliciously comply and hide the tariff metadata in the HTML for the browser extensions.
either way it would be free speech if an add-on or a website did it.
but those days are over.
I bet, yes, good point
💡:
“Tariff GUESStimator for Amazon | Firefox”