return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 19 days agoJoe Rogan criticizes ICE tactics: 'Are we really going to be the Gestapo?'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square238linkfedilinkarrow-up1794arrow-down111cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1783arrow-down1external-linkJoe Rogan criticizes ICE tactics: 'Are we really going to be the Gestapo?'www.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 19 days agomessage-square238linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squarehector@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·18 days agoI didn’t read that drivel past the first sentence. Typical, projecting onto your victims, in this case those trying to get a winning strategy.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·18 days agoThe strategy of sitting on the sidelines because Kamala didn’t promise you a fucking pony? How well is that working out for you?
minus-squareHalfSalesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·18 days agoWhy would strategy matter anymore?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·18 days agoYou… already used that line.
minus-squarehector@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·18 days agoStop refusing to answer the question honestly and I would’ve stopped repeating it. But now we can stop, because absent an argument with merit, considering I reject everything you think now without addressing the original question, I will ignore you.
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·18 days agoYou refused to read that comment past the first sentence, how do you know they didn’t answer the question honestly or had a meritless argument?
I didn’t read that drivel past the first sentence. Typical, projecting onto your victims, in this case those trying to get a winning strategy.
The strategy of sitting on the sidelines because Kamala didn’t promise you a fucking pony? How well is that working out for you?
Why would strategy matter anymore?
You… already used that line.
Stop refusing to answer the question honestly and I would’ve stopped repeating it.
But now we can stop, because absent an argument with merit, considering I reject everything you think now without addressing the original question, I will ignore you.
You refused to read that comment past the first sentence, how do you know they didn’t answer the question honestly or had a meritless argument?