The CEO can’t be held personally liable for the actions of the company, for example; their underlings could have been responsible and kept the leader in the dark.
The onus should be on the company to prove their employees kept the CEO in the dark, not the other way around.
The onus should be on the company to prove their employees kept the CEO in the dark, not the other way around.
deleted by creator
So you like the benefit of being on top of the hierarchy without the responsibility.
Congrats.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The problem is that once the law has been weaponized against the people, the only laws that matter are the ones they are using to harm you.
deleted by creator
Funnest part about this is that muskrat is renowned for shoving his dick into the business workings