• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    all the things you said are good provided the dipstick is still there. cost nonwhitstanding.

    which is already a thing in some cars.

    a lot of the ones that get rid of the dipstick (its semi-common on transmissions now) end up being disposable.

    friend of mine had a ford like this. and it cost more than the car to fix after only 10-15ish years of use. its terrible.

    • 3abas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      friend of mine had a ford like this. and it cost more than the car to fix after only 10-15ish years of use. its terrible.

      Yeah, that’s just how it goes as the engine becomes more complex, leaving a dipstick there is not gonna change that…

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        leaving a dipstick there and not recommending against changing your transmission fluid would not have ruined the car in a measly decade.

        please don’t trust these corporations. unrepairable items are engineered to be unrepairable, and vice versa.