Ehh. I don’t think its fair to assume that. It could just be “pro censorship arguments out of concern for others”

Fistbumps should be prohibited in media too. Literally punching each other!!!

Fennec (mobile Firefox clone)

It’s not a Firefox clone, it is Firefox.

I do not understand how anyone uses mobile apps with ads. thats just so dystopian to me

“walk around, come on our streets, and demand our children”

someone’s projecting

I know involuntary commitments have been horribly abused in the past.

It’s not all in the past. They are still abused today.

Not every religious person wants to commit mass murder.

No, because that person is not able to have any say in the matter (they are unconcious). All we can do is operate in their best interest, by getting them medical help.

However, a person with mental illness is concious (in this case) and can advocate for themselves and we shouldn’t deny them the right to do so. That would be oppression.

Do you think all schizophrenic people should be forcefully medicated even if they don’t pose a threat to others? Because a lot of religious people aren’t a threat to anybody. They aren’t all extremists.

I agreed up until the end. Forcefully medicating people into a “barely functional stupor” is a horrific human rights violation.

“Free software” is different from “software that is free”

Not suprising, they already did a hit and run on a cyclist and pedestrian in LA.

B-b-b-bill nyeee the science guuy

How might they do that?

Why so?

true, you got me

Masturbating would imply physical genital stimulation, something that the Internet cannot perform.

Store passwords.

I gotta disagree. It’s much harder to do this well offline. Losing access to a password database would be detrimental, so it’s not something I recommend doing purely locally.

How does one do that online?

You are assuming having pride means you put down others accomplishments, but that’s not always the case. You can be a fan of a sports team and still not hate the opposing team.