If a sentient balloon animal filled with smegma, nerves, and pus could gain the capacity for communication, then I would prefer it’s company over that of Ted Cruz.

Well, it’s been fun matching wits with a potato, but I think I’ve seen what you have to offer.

Enjoy your meal!

Better than to ask your preference? I guess your betters let you know what you like. You’re right, I was being a silly goose.

I guess licking boots gives you a lot of time to think. What’s your favorite flavor of polish?

Oh, I never thought of it like that.

What a great criticism! You’re obliviously someone who has thought long and hard about this topic

Chewbacca ate my balls.

Do you need me to help you out of the evidence room, step cop?

You do realize your comments are public, right?

This is like having a battle of wits with a bowl of oatmeal.

I’m not sure what itch you’re trying to scratch by behaving this way, but I hope you find it someday.

I certainly don’t.

Reactionaries don’t think you and I should have rights. They want to restructure society to permanently install themselves as a superior class over the people they hate, and they’re way too dumb to realize that they’re also on the list of people who will be subjugated if their dreams came true.

They have a set of values that is inherently antisocial, and they have no place in a free and equal society.

Hey, it’s the Nazi apologist who constantly simps for Elon Musk!

Here’s your boy:

You’re so fragile that you had to ban the word “fascist” when you were still running your pissant little conservative community LMAO!

Tee hee! It’s so much fun to be a chode! Is that why you’re a bootlicker? That’s fun for you?

More proof that reactionaries only care about pissing people off, because they’re hollow inside.

It’s a 4chan ideology for antisocial weirdos. What a dork.

Can always count on reactionaries to lick some boots. Didn’t even need a prompt before you got on your hands and knees.

I do apologize for that edit, I did so at the same time that you responded.

And for the record, I do have a lot of respect for you. It’s just frustrating how you blame people to your left for the failings of a rigidly centrist party.

I thought we were arguing over feelings?

Besides, I’m using the stuff you provided— MAGA voters crossed over to vote for AOC.

It sounds like you’re just saying whatever you can to blame the progressives instead of the vast majority of the party then.

Maybe they shouldn’t structurally oppose the people who get that crossover vote by actually helping their constituency? You know, the people who don’t take money from billionaires and therefore aren’t beholden to them?

Ah yes, I love how progressives are both too small to matter, yet large enough to throw a whole-ass election.

So we’re going with the loudest dipshits on the Internet being representative of the caucus?

Then I have bad news about the way centrists talk about their allies in the progressive caucus.

Yes, we’ve established that Harris lost. Remember when we did that?

You’ve yet to demonstrate your claim that it was the progressives fault though despite your constant bitching about it. It sure seems like you’re incapable of doing so or you’d have done it already.

What makes you think it was the progressives’ doing and not Biden refusing to step aside to have a real primary? Oh that’s right: you’d never blame the center for their incompetence.

Let’s see those numbers!

Unless you don’t have them?

I don’t care about feelings, I want numbers.

Also, are you saying that everyone who voted for AOC was a progressive? Because that seems wrong if they also voted for a fascist. How do you separate out the people who aren’t progressives and voted for AOC? Feelings?

Surely there’s a non-zero number of them. Why are you counting them as progressives who crossed over instead of MAGA who did?