Decentralise everything!
Not making sure the result even makes sense. There was a real example, where a ~2010 news article said that the number of crimes in their city has been doubling every year since ~1980.
That is not possible. Assume that there was one crime in 1980. In 2010, there must be at least 2^20 crimes.
Hypocrisy! Someone is committing hypocrisy at the church on 325289 ave!
That’s it exactly. JBP, JD Vance, etc., play word games of rhetoric to get what they want. It’s like they are defence lawyers and morality is a legal system they are trying to game - they argue whatever just to win.
Oh. Actually that clarifies alot.
Facilitate is the key word. The SC judge left it to the fedral judge to define what it means, taking into account impact on foreign policy.
So, it is not necessarily just an empty word.
I would love that here
Omg youre the expert I am looking for! I would like to DIY an internet router that can communicate with whales.
And apparently a mural… which was vandalized in February
I hate you for this
Excuse my ignorance. Could someone elaborate?
Does this include HB-1?
/s
You know what China should do? Ban all exports to the US. Wtf you gonna tariff now, bitch?
Paused to wait for what? What is going to change as time passes?
I agree, but what is the alternative? I mean, is there a neutral way to get new supreme court justices?
(Honestly askibg)
I love the line “Mullin … criticized The Oklahoman for covering the story.”
Actually, if you can’t win at a game then it is by definition a rigged game.
Whether they are appealing or not, this sounds like the administration is breaking the law. The ruling to allow AP doesn’t stop taking effect if an appeal is in process.
The Trump Administration keeps abusing that. They appeal something, and just do whatever they want until the appeal is processed.