putting on deodorant

feels gross smells gross

in case you don’t know, there is the option under user settings to hide bots.

nothing shocking there.

finally 35, she can run for president, she should win. if I trust any politician to pull the States out of a nosedive, it’s sanders or AOC, and I do like that she’s half a century younger.

my 2 cents:

none of what you’ve written here indicates you weren’t born gay.

“…wish i was in the woman’s shoes in porn (autogynephilia), that was my first homo sexual desire.”

that doesn’t sound like you were “simply born straight”

your post strongly suggests to me you have a lot to learn and accept about sexuality.

“always had a totally masculine identity, male engagements”

saying something like this indicates to me that you don’t understand the complexities of masculinity, femininity or sexuality.

did you read a lot of books as a child? is that masculine or feminine? did you climb trees?

assigning labels and expectations to your behaviors may be why you don’t view your own sexuality as “a case of normal, stable homosexuality”.

which is what it sounds like you are discovering: a case of innate normal, stable homosexuality.

He is a rapist.

does explain everything.

I was in the same boat and read a lot of different books and watched videos on how to draw, and the number one thing that helped me was the frequency with which I drew.

techniques made a difference certainly, but the amount that I drew was the primary factor in how satisfied I became with my art.

if I can share purely anecdotal evidence, something that seems to help me was not drawing the next line until I could see the next line in my head, and project that mental next line onto the paper that I was drawing.

I didn’t read that or watch that anywhere, I just thought that if I could picture what I wanted to draw in my head, I could probably draw it, and until that point I wasnt clearly picturing what I wanted to draw in my head.

your comment is incorrect because:

1. those who do not survive cannot speak up at all

2. it’s far more difficult to live for a cause than to die for it.

if this is about your survival, then survive.

surviving doesn’t mean you care any less; you’re taking care of yourself and hopefully in the future you’ll be in a better position to speak up for those rights like you obviously want to in the future.

whoa, really?

nice! congrats!

yes, herbalists and healers would have access to and knowledge of fast-acting poisons.

there are plenty of plants like nightshade that can rapidly kill a human, and those familiar with plant life would be well aware of that.

hemlock isn’t as fast acting, maybe a few hours before death if you ate it, but that’s how Socrates was executed 2400 years ago, and according to sources it took about half an hour for him to die, so knowledge of fast-acting poisons is very old.

One of those people who don’t put up with your garbage?

Yes, I’m one of those.

goodbye.

sure

yup

“tiny cracks” is an incorrect objective statement.

Nationwide movements, billions of dollars and presidential policy halts are objectively not “tiny cracks”.

“tiny cracks compared to the size of…”, is an example of a relative statement, which was not said in the original comment.

they later changed what they said, trying to change their original, incorrect statement.

doesn’t work for them when they have a public comment history, of course.

““Big” or “small” is relative, which was exactly my original point.”

you are incorrect.

your original point was that the cracks showing in Trump’s administration were tiny cracks, which is objectively false.

then you changed it to say that the cracks were relatively tiny compared to a vague, unquantifiable overwhelming opposition, which is a different comparison (those are the goal posts you changed), which is also objectively untrue, as shown above.

now you are pretending that an objective statement is the same as a relative statement, which it objectively is not.

you don’t have to hide behind reinterpreting what you said; accept your mistake and move on.

“that’s all the interest I have in arguing with someone about this.”

obviously untrue, as you concocted a reimagining of events and posted them.

“I am not talking to you” he claims, talking to you.

despite changing the goal posts, you are still incorrect; your uninformed anxiety is why I have to be realistic.

You are incorrect. A nationwide movement of judges, lawyers and activists actively halting the President’s will and chosen policy is not a “tiny crack”. Billions of dollars redirected is not a “tiny crack”.

“tiny cracks” like dozens of judges blocking presidential executive orders and blocking administrative Nationwide policy.

tiny cracks like your own party turning against you, like literally Nationwide protests and civil rights union suing the presidential administration?

those are not little cracks, and it is ignorant and meaning a few to pretend that they are.

those Resistance movements are very clear demonstrations that everybody, even the extremists think Trump is harmful.

no one talked about complacency before you did.

there are cracks, these are the facts. you don’t have to caution against things that are not happening, you have to recognize what is happening and deal with the reality there.

there are cracks. The Supreme Court just ruled against Rump again, has approval rating is already diving, Republicans are protesting against rump, there are literally Nationwide protests with tens of thousands of people, and judges all over the country are blocking rump policies.

there are cracks, don’t pretend here.

i have five!

Part 1: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20963677/12244341

Part 2: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20963677/12244356

Part 3: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20963677/12244394

Part 4: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20963677/12244399

Part 5: https://sh.itjust.works/post/20963677/12244409

bear in mind that this is a second draft direct refutation of a list of Darth Binks evidence provided by another friendly user and we were having fun talking about it, so i was pretty casual speech to texting all of this and there might be typos.

also, if you have any direct questions or evidence of the darth binks theory, I’m ready to talk about it, it’s a very fun theory.

have a good one