deleted by creator

…yeah. I added a filter in Tesseract to automatically hide “drive-by” posts for accounts that are less than a week old who self-delete themselves. Can’t stand that.

Not that that isn’t good advice to make mods’ lives easier in general, but for the ban evader I think you’re talking about, it’s usually pretty apparent if you look at the profile of the user being reported:

1. Minutes old, 10+ posts and no comments or maybe 1 boilerplate-looking one.
2. Usually cycles through c/Politics, c/News, c/Health, c/UK, c/Ohio, c/Television and a few others
3. Here lately, spams out 10+ posts rapid-fire and then deletes the account (not all UIs indicate a user is deleted, but that info is often helpful).

Granted, I’m really good at pattern matching. It’s like my one neurodivergent superpower lol.

I shouldn’t say this, but whatever: It’s a “troll” tactic to do that since mods/admins can’t ban with content removal if the account is deleted (unless that’s fixed in .13?) . Admins can remove the deleted flag in the DB for the user and then do so, but mods can only remove items individually. Not that any of these necessarily warrant removal on their own, but not doing so in this case encourages this kind of “hit it and quit it” behavior, and this user is clearly ban evading.

I’m not saying this as an instruction manual but merely as a statement of fact about how stupid Lemmy’s behavior is with regard to deleted accounts.

They’ve had many, many alts over the last 6+ months with the same posting pattern. Not one has been marked as a bot.

Ok, I just gotta ask: what is your motive here?

You get banned every other day for spamming out a massive number of posts. And you just make a new account the next day, start the exact same thing again like…you’ve learned nothing?

I’m tired of my feed being an entire page of just you, and I’m tired of blocking you. Can you not just post things at a normal rate?

Email on your own domain: Yep, super easy.

Email from home IP or from the IPv4 you get assigned with a VPS: Super difficult

To be fair, it began with the misstep of his senate confirmation.

Good points.

I don’t have a full plan yet (just the general idea of a plan), but when I start the journey to Piefed, it’ll probably be from the ground up or very close to that. I already need to update the codebase from Svelte 4 to Svelte 5 which is a pretty big job due to the fundamental and breaking changes between those two versions.

The components that make up Tesseract (posts, comments, sidebars, everything) are also all heavily tied to Lemmy’s type definitions. To support Piefed, I’d have to de-couple the components in the code from Lemmy’s type def and add in an abstraction layer (both for future-proofing and to make it possible to support both if I wanted to).

Yeah…I’ve had to do a LOT of work client-side in Tesseract to give Lemmy half the features Piefed has. Eventually I’m gonna start targeting Piefed, but there’s some under the hood stuff I’m waiting to be resolved before I embark on that voyage. Mainly, I’ve heard that the main Piefed experience and the API are not 1:1 and not everything is exposed in the API. :(

It doesn’t now, but I’d be willing to add that to Tesseract. Seems easy enough to implement.

Edit: It’s not fully plumbed in yet, but the settings to configure it have been added to the filter policy framework. Will probably also do a similar setting for comments. Shown enabled here, but disabled by default, naturally.

Edit 2: Plumbed in and working now in the dev build. Can also completely hide those, but that doesn’t exactly work for a screenshot.

The discussion you’re chiming in on wasn’t even about this article; it was about one from a week ago. And now you’re butting in with the wrong context, making unfounded accusations, jumping to conclusions, and throwing out personal attacks… Keep up or keep out.

Mod removals should link to this automatically and be more transparent for why comments were removed in the first place

I linked to the modlog through Lemmy World’s instance of Tesseract. I’m the dev of that UI, and I agree with you that removal reasons should be more accessible.

A version or two ago I built in a feature to automatically resolve the removal reason and append it where the comment would be, right there in the comment section. If that’s disabled, there’s a button to take you to the modlog for that item.

If Tesseract isn’t your cup of tea, maybe ask the dev of your client to add a similar feature.

I’m done. I’m fucking done. You’ve moved the goalposts so far beyond the original that I don’t think we’re even in the same state we started out in.

Bottom line: You were espousing dangerous rhetoric given how flippantly people around here resort to calling others nazis (the subjects of articles and other users both). You can’t just deem/call someone a nazi and use that as an excuse for “anything goes”. I’ve explained how that is a dangerous cocktail.

Say what you will. If it’s in violations of the rules, it’ll probably get modded. If the behavior repeats, you may get a ban. That’s not specific to you; it applies to everyone. In no way are mod actions here to be interpreted as anything other than maintaining a civil atmosphere and adherence to the community rules and the LW TOS.

Don’t like it? Go over to YPTB and whine and spin another tall tale about how mods here are fascist bootlickers because we won’t let people screech for violence. Or you can go find another community that allows that kind of bullshit. Frankly, I don’t give a fuck.,

I’ve explained the rationale behind the mod actions clearly and more than once. If you don’t get it by now, I’m not going to entertain you any further.

They’re literally in the modlog - all you have to do is look.

https://t.lemmy.world/modlog?community=1347

Removed by mod

Possibly, yes. Resistance comes in many flavors. There are benefits to having people inside, whether that is to smuggle information, provide small comforts to those affected, be eyes and ears, etc.

The point is you (nor I) do not know anything about this guy other than the bits in the article, and there is not enough information to merit a response such as “he is not human and deserves imprisonment or worse”. I’m not defending him specifically (again, insufficient info), but I am condemning you (and anyone else painting the world in such broad strokes) for throwing out assumptions, espousing dehumanizing rhetoric based upon those assumptions, and the hypocritical advocacy of imprisoning people you deem not human.

TL;DR: You’re advocating the same tactics used by those you so abhor on a platform where the demographic calls each other nazis in the comments like it’s a cheat code to winning an argument. I’ve already explained why this rhetoric is dangerous.

Yes, and? Those were not the people the post in question was about. You just unilaterally declared the subject of that post a nazi, decreed that they’re not human (dehumanizing), and that they deserved to be imprisoned because of that. When other commenters pointed out how hypocritical your take was, you doubled down.

The only thing the article mentioned about the guy was that he was a Trump voter. Yes, the nazi bar analogy exists but it’s also true that some people really are just that stupid or brainwashed or otherwise poisoned by the Kool-Aid. Wsa the guy a piece of shit person? Perhaps. Misinformed? Perhaps. An actual Nazi that deserves to be imprisoned or worse? That’s a wee bit of a dangerous stretch given that there was insufficient information to rationally arrive at that conclusion.

I never said they don’t deserve human rights. I’ve said they are not human.

That’s literally dehumanizing. I don’t know how you think there’s a difference. If you decree that someone is not human, then what else can you possibly call that?

Why are you tolerant of nazis enough…

I’m not. That’s just the conclusion you jumped to because I modded you for dehumanizing people in the same way the ones you have such strong opinions about have done. Again, yes, the paradox of tolerance exists, but it is not a blank check for that kind of behavior.

Ok see? We’re not even talking about the same thing. And yet the word Nazi is in the undertone.

Yes actual Nazis are bad. (I can’t believe I have to fucking clarify that; jesus goddamned christ on rubber crutches 🤦‍♂️). But lemmy just throws that word around so cavalierly and indiscriminately it’s hard to even take it seriously anymore. Add on people dehumanizing anyone they personally think is a nazi, and that’s a recipe for not good.