Like, names of presidents? Dude.

C’mon, the writers have NOT been subtle about how the show is gonna end.

Oh and here’s how Tom Cruise REALLY looks in 2026, even in his real runway pr pics -

https://i.iplsc.com/tom-cruise/000KYLH1EJLCYR1T-C461-F4.jpg

For real. I’ve seen recent photos of Tom Cruise where he’s looking raggedly old. A runway PR press pic isn’t at all representative of how a person looks compared to a pic on the street in the middle of a regular day shot by a paparazzi using a telephoto lens when the subject was unaware that their picture was being taken.

Ridiculous meaningless comparison.

And on top of that, it’s totally ok for a person to just live their regular life and not spend tons of life energy trying to look a certain way.

As i said in my original post, “A dumb circuit without even a single chip in it could do that.” Vibration units can literally just respond to voltage. It’s how electrical devices worked before chips, like old pinball machines and old radios. It works just like how a standing fan works - there’s a mechanical motor, and you literally just need to attach plain copper wires onto the motor’s contact points and stick the other ends of the wire into the slots of a wall power outlet.

I don’t think that actually answers OP’s question. If all it does is vibrate then it doesn’t need any software. It presumably just has a single button that turns vibration on/off and maybe cycles through vibration levels. A dumb circuit without even a single chip in it could do that.

Good suggestions, thanks!

A trough or elevated bed or ongoing maintenance isn’t possible in the kind of quick hit unofficial guerilla action that i can do.

The thing that got me thinking it is that I’ve seen years-abandoned pots on nyc rooftops that have wild plants that grew themselves there. So the conditions (whatever they are) can easily support unattended plant life, so the question is which ones will work there that are good for pollinators or the environment?

Zillions of wild plants grow extremely well in unattended planter pots in nyc. They’re all over the place.

And there’s no such thing as “weeds”. A weed just means a plant that grew itself in a spot where a person didn’t want it to be. A weed is just a plant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weed

When people set out empty planters of soil they always wind up growing lush with random plants. The question isn’t what plants can grow by themselves there, because that does itself. -

My question is what plants can i plant there that would be especially good for the environment?

That’s not true. There’s tons of plants that grow gangbusters in unattended street planters, and heck even cracks in the sidewalk

.one

That already exists

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.one_(domain)

Which park?

Damn their kidneys must be monsters to process that much water every time they eat a little fishy

EDIT:

Actually it turns out they spit out all the water before swallowing. Makes much more sense

Their throat pouch can hold over 3 gallons (13 liters) of water, but they drain the water before swallowing their prey.

https://earthsky.org/earth/pelicans-are-the-masters-of-air-land-and-water/

College radio and commercial-free independent radio. Streaming over the net of course

This needs to be the rop comment.

I think OP meant is the image of trump here real

The company recently changed the 5 minute required wait down to 3 minutes.

Your confused about what I’m saying. The ARRAY OF RADAR STATIONS is emitters. I’m saying THE ATTACKERS AGAINST the array of radar stations only need to be passive detectors.

That’s the topic of the thread your replying in. Quote:

you could theoretically make a moderately large distributed array sprinkled over a few square kilometers

Your information about passive radar detection is not up to date. There are tons of passive detection of radar systems that by design do zero emission. The radar array stations will need to emit in order to function, but the enemy can find those radar emitters without emitting any energy of their own

https://daronmont.com.au/products/passive-radar

I’m not understanding. Let’s say army A has a radar array of 500 relatively cheap radar stations. They clump them all into a 1 square km area. So now army Z drives some howitzers nearby (which aren’t detectable by ground based radar), waits till a radar station turns on, the passively locates the radar base station, and shoots a cheap shell at it which destroys it.

But if you say army A has the level of military equipment that can locate and destroy howitzers up to 30 km away in all directions, then what benefit does an array of concentrated radar stations provide?