Local models are actually pretty great! They are not great at everything… but for what most people are using LLMs for they do a fine job.
Thats from llama3.1:8b and the answer is decent, it took about 20seconds to generate my answer and used no more power than if I were to play a video game for the same amount of time.
Just clearly list the ingredients
That way I don’t have to badger the waiter with my 10+ allergies AND hopefully not forget one until I see it on my plate
Most of these things are pretty secure out of the box.
Even without fail2ban disabling root login and only allowing SSH key authentication makes those scripts just a waste of time for the attacker. That game is a low effort attempt to just get the low hanging fruit for botnets though.
Yes, My home network setup is a bit complicated but I am using Pfsense so I have things on separate vlans with internal firewall rules to reduce risks.
All traffic in on port 443 is routed from Cloudflare to an NginX reverse proxy which decides how to connect back into my network for things
Years ago I would just run a server on the network with 443, 80 and 22 exposed directly to the world and never had any major issues. (Other than the normal automated attacks trying to gain shell access over SSH)
I got 1gbps internet (symmetrical) and a raspberry pi cluster… running my own Wordpress never made more sense… AND that botch should scale!
Dicks out for cricket!!
1984 has the bleak ending…
He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother
They kept people docile in 1984 with war and rations
Maybe you are thinking of A Brave New World? (I haven’t read that)
All I hear is NFTs
The IMDB scores on his movie projects averaged out are objectively shit… the article was being so kind to him lol
He will sue you!!
I agree mostly but whats really funny about this episode is the meta around it.
They actually attacked a lot of things in the episode and every joke is actually pretty good
Cartman’s whole B-Plot is outlining exactly where they are creatively. If it’s not controversial to say mean things, then whats the point of Cartman? Making fun of and pissing off Trump is their best chance at comedy right now.
Saddam voice is a great attack because they didn’t waste time trying to parody a wannabe middle eastern dictator
Likewise, because South Park Trump IS just Saddam. It is unlikely he will become a liked character like Mr Garrison’s Trump parody was
They haven’t used the F slur I think since season 13. They took two slurs that you can see people trying to mainstream again and directed them at Trump specifically numerous times.
For the record, I credit SouthPark for removing that word from the Zeitgeist for my friends and me. For a couple of months in 2009 thats what we called Harley riders, and then the joke got stale and with that the word just quit being said by us.
The main punchline of AI Trump naked in the desert is a direct challenge to use the “Take it Down Act”
I like to think that the episode wasn’t for fans as much as it was for Trump and team
I think the pay off (whether in real life or in the show itself) will be amusing in the end
If you are really good at what you do you could avoid a lot of the mess by driving a classic. (Scouring junkyards)
The real challenge though isn’t just that the parts will have tariffs; It seems like auto parts in general have taken a massive hit in quality
Tariffs are new.
They will push average prices even higher but the average new car price has been around 40k for a few years now.
It’s crazy to me. I just focus on my personal debts and pay off timelines and ignore my credit score these days.
Banks were willing to give me mortgages a couple of months ago that I in no way could afford based off my score (it’s actually good). None of this is grounded in reality; prior to 2020 those same fucks wouldn’t even pick up the phone for me.
… Try that shit in a small town?
Not the arbitrary made up numbers that some how go down every time I pay off a car loan!!!
I like to think of it as a lower case “t” when I see that it means “time to leave”
I have been on the other side of the equation professionally speaking.
I think we mostly agree.
The auditors were certainly not malicious, they can simply only see what they can observe.
Appealing to authority without explaining the caveats is risky to do and disingenuous to people who need to take security very seriously right now.
A potential vector or matter of concern does not mean there is a compromise. Without evidence of a hack or compromise you just have the idea that something could happen.
The app model in general has meant that we have given up tremendous amounts of privacy and security in general for the sake of connivence.
If I were the developer of this app I would’ve approached things from the inception with the question of “How do I get people to trust me who absolutely should not trust me?”
That said, it is always easier to tear down than it is to build.
If I were an at risk individual I would likely opt to use the app myself assuming I could share general location instead of specific location. In areas like LA there is likely a lot of data flowing in that would not help a malicious actor if the location is not specific.
When you do business with companies in certain industries not only is your software audited but your entire development process, business processes and staff are audited.
It’s not unreasonable to question a closed source application for something like this as one version was audited, but what about the next?
How do we know their dev process hasn’t been compromised? Or the person building app wasn’t compromised? Or that the entire thing was not compromised from the start?
Likewise, an audit without full access to code isn’t useless, but hiding behavior from an audit and for a certain period of time would be straight forward. How do you know there is not a dormant command and control system in the app that will cause it to behave in a malicious manner after a set amount of time or after a specific push notification is received?
I am not saying this is present, just that Audits like this are only able to catch what they can observe and the existence of an audit does not mean to blindly trust something
Having the App be open source would be a big step towards providing the transparency needed to address these concerns users would not have to trust anyone and can confirm the builds on the app stores match what is on their Git.
I am not pointing this out to jump on the “Don’t use this app” bandwagon. I am pointing it out to say that there are reasons to be skeptical of these sorts of things in our current political climate.
Remember Sabu and LulzSec
I mean, if we are going to capitalism with a straight face we have to start being the whole bitch.
He owned it, Lamborghini wanted it… that made it a valuable asset that he held that Lamborghini should have paid for