Nix is great for reproducibility

Your description does not sound related to git. It sounds more like nix

It does not fork anything. Right now, it uses already existing fedora / oci images.

Thanks, it’s good advice that you do not need a gpu if you watch movies in 1080. It’s sufficient for 99% setups anyway

how many 4k streams?

For how many devices?

3. If you do not want stuttering, use a graphics card. Higher energy consumption but you can play everything

Cool!

Do you plan to support adbc?

Could you maybe work with someone together, or get inspiration from something like the docs project from the european union https://docs.numerique.gouv.fr/ ?

Moreover, I’m an “advanced user” and I want to write with markdown and/or typst. A wysiwyg typst editor would be amazing

Edit: did I mix google keep and docs? Probably. Sorry 😅

Edit2: are you looking into vjournals? https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/support-vjournal-in-thunderbird/idi-p/46295

It says

Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led effort that provides Git hosting and other services for free and open source projects.

Codeberg?

Caddy does not need 80 and 443. I’ve changed them to unprivileged ports like 8000 and 8443.

Besides, op doesn’t mention having problems with ports

What does it do?

You might be interested in reproducible-builds.org or f-droid.org/en/docs/Reproducible_Builds

You could say that, yes.

It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.

It’s kind of the default in the docs

https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=License#the-license-and-license-file-fields

SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1

  [package]
   # ...
  license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"

Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:

MIT OR Apache-2.0
LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2

When I started out (I don’t write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is “more free”. I wasn’t aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again

Thanks!

I use nginxproxymanager, I’ll try to find something similar (I couldn’t find something directly)

People have to understand that if the price is too high, they can just not buy it.

It is as simple as that. As long as you buy, it is not too expensive. Just stop eating eggs.