If you want low effort high value then get a synology 2 bay. If you want full control over the host OS then run Debian/arch with zfs
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
erock@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Proxmox: Make CT Fuse Mount Available to HostEnglish1·1 day agoI went down a similar path as you. The entire proxmox community argues making it an appliance with nothing extra installed on the host. But the second you need to share data — like a nas — the tooling is a huge pain. I couldn’t reliably find a solution that felt right.
So my solution was to make my nas a zfs pool on my host. Bind mounting works for CTs but not VMs which is an annoying feature asymmetry. So I decided to also install an nfs server that exposed my nas.
I know that’s not what you want but just wanted to share what I did.
The feature asymmetry between CTs and VMs basically made CTs not part of my orchestration.
erock@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Those who are hosting on bare metal: What is stopping you from using Containers or VM's? What are you self hosting?English1·1 day agoHere’s my homelab journey: https://bower.sh/homelab
Basically, containers and GPU is annoying to deal with, GPU pass through to a VM is even more annoying. Most modern hobbyist GPUs also do not support splitting your GPU. At the end of the day, it’s a bunch of tinkering which is valuable if that’s your goal. I learned what I wanted, now I’m back to arch running everything with systemd and quadlet
erock@lemmy.mlto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Ladybird Browser Gains Cloudflare Support to Challenge the Status Quo2·1 day agoIt is being rewritten using swift
I’ve been slowly working on a set of decoupled services that could replace some aspects of GitHub.
https://pr.pico.sh/ — a pastebin supercharged for git collaboration.
https://pgit.pico.sh/ — static site generator for git repos.
Both are still WIP but I think they are pretty handy