Google isn’t the only service checking for csam. Microsoft (and other file hosting services, likely) also have methods to do this. This doesn’t mean they also host csam to detect it. I believe their checks use hash values to determine if a picture is already clocked as being in that category.
This has existed since 2009 and provides good insight on the topic, used for detecting all sorts of bad category images:
There’s no point in taking moderation seriously. It’s a volunteer position and the tools to handle slop aren’t there.
I hear they’re bringing back digg.
I also hear it’s a former Reddit C-suite that’s bringing it back, so it’ll probably be more of the same.
I thought he wasn’t allowed to delete posts? Maybe only certain types of posts?
Before the KKK?
They’re not paying their workers, either, and they have large targets for offshoring a percentage of their workforces.
Last I checked years ago, they sold their carbon credits for a whole lot of money whenever they earned them.
AI can scrape books and journals for info, but can’t scrape Reddit?
All you need to know about his company promises: “HE FIXED TRAFFIC”, from Adam Something on YouTube: https://youtu.be/p8NiM_p8n5A
Less people on Mastodon, to me, means that the Mastodon community is more purposeful across their instances. Less bloat/spam/etc
It’s a hard truth of life that plenty of people who do evil still die happy and feeling like they’ve won.
Not only was the apology horrible, but for any user on that platform for YEARS: obviously puts the thought in their head that spez could be changing their words by directly editing the db, and getting them put on a list for wrong-speak. Sure, that’s possible with any DB, but he proved it was actually something being done on that site. Given his role, a major red flag, as this type of action would normally result in someone being fired.
Reddit has since IPOd and is going to probably do well as a stock because of all the information it harvests from users.
Probably died happy and with his family around him, too.
I’ll never forget how he changed users’ text without them knowing it before the 2016 election. Reddit was going downhill before, but that was a turning point.
One of my conservative friends (also a woman) said the same thing: women shouldn’t be in power. Stunlocked me for a second.
Make an AI that is trained on the books.
Tell it to tell you a story for one of the books.
Read the story without paying for it.
The law says this is ok now, right?
How does this not anger the domestic prison industrial complex?
I’m being a bit extra but…
Your statement:
The article headline:
The general story in reference to the headline:
The article headline is accurate if you interpret it as
“A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It” (“it” being “csam”).
The article headline is inaccurate if you interpret it as
“A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It” (“it” being “reporting csam”).
I read it as the former, because the action of reporting isn’t listed in the headline at all.
___