Doesn’t defend!? They’re straight up just posting the stream keys…

Just look at the people in charge of the Democratic party. Especially the ones who are planning to die in office to leave behind a legacy.

They’re just conservatives in sheep’s clothing. They’ve done the bare minimum to seem left leaning, but they’re currently clinging to power and are refusing anyone with “socialist” views to get any power. They’ve been blocking Bernie for over a decade, they’re making sure AOC doesn’t make big tweets that would overshadow their Newsom puppet, the DNC changed their rules to prevent new blood, etc.

Specifically the “open” web. They recently said the web was thriving from their point of view. Since they’re a major part of what is “closing” the web.

Why would you even think otherwise? They’re corrupt to the point where one of them has been openly shown and proven to accept bribes.

Why do they frame it as rights? Let’s start with not fucking killing them, I’m pretty sure that’s a little more fundamental than rights.

Because traditional news have drilled into many people’s head that there are no innocents there, at all.

Some of them are so delusional that they think phrases like “Stop killing children” is said in support of terrorism. It’s honestly 1984 levels of brainwashing.

That was lost a while ago, but it’s nice more people are noticing that it’s getting worse.

RBG did the same thing.

Retire? Oh you’re funny.

She is 100% planning on dying in office. She’s obviously one those people who are obsessed with leaving a “legacy”. In her mind she’s going to be remember as the first female member of the House and a groundbreaking feminist who made way for others, etc.

Which would have probably stuck if she’d retired a decade ago. Now she’s going to remembered as a greedy ghoul who intentionally sabotaged other politicians and held back society to enrich herself. This is too little, too late.

That’s their goal for sure, what I mean is how are they pretending to justify it?

The same way they always do: “WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?!?!?!1111”

Many billionaires live on a man made island ioff the coast of Florida?

It’s inside the Miami metropolitan area.

Last cenus was in 2020, showing 41 homes and 84 people across 0.43 sq mi/1.11km². It is sometimes referred to as “Billionaire bunker”, because it’s a gated community on an island, and the one bridge in and out has a police checkpoint, it also apparently has its own government and law enforcement. If you try to get close by water, a police boat shows up.

Why are dems endlessly talking about what messaging they should do?

Because it’s all about the optics. They don’t actually do any of those things, they just want people to think they are.

Exactly. They “crawl” category/tag lists, etc. and follow links. And if there are no links to those pages, they wont be indexed.

(Depending on some settings. For all I know they’ve set up “hidden redirects” for popular crawlers to pages that show them)

edit: right, respective tags list no porn games anymore.

Which could cause them to no longer be indexed by search engines depending on other settings. So you’d need to find direct links from other websites.

It’s intentional.

The people who put them into those positions of power want their money. Him firing these people will cause deaths and people will demand a solution. Then they’ll announce some “amazing” private solution that will be worse and cost more.

Deindexed/delisted, not removed.

Try putting the names into the search field on the site, or browsing for them in the categories they are in.

Not at all.

More attention means more people see it, so even if the percentage of complainers haven’t changed, there are more people who know.

On top of that, there was criticism before. There’s that streamer who was mocked relentlessly in comments and some defending him, there were articles about game developer lobby groups complaining that were posted here, etc.

If you do a “germany walmart before:2023” search, you’ll find a bunch of English articles about the whole ordeal. It was in Forbes, NYT, etc. almsot twenty years ago because of how badly they failed on multiple levels.

Don’t forget that like most racist and anti-immigration parties of the world, they have ties to Russia.

The head of the party of course denied this, as he did in the past when he tried to claim that Russia wasn’t really responsible for the war in Ukraine…

Put on some traditional TV news and you’ll basically be told that there are no civilians there.

The average boomer think the entire place is 100% terrorists. They’re not told about the suffering of innocents. And this isn’t me speaking about America, I’m talking about non-conservative European news. The amount of propaganda is mind boggling.

None of the documentation or statements by US officials are consistent, and appear to include a bit of lying. So people are leaning towards him being at least partially correct in his accusations.

In short, they saw the picture and then began an extended interview where they made a bunch of false claims, and used made up reasons to deny him. Then later claimed they used more reasonable argument, which also doesn’t really hold water.