

I’m gonna tuck into my chocolate orange


I’m gonna tuck into my chocolate orange


AAAAAAH I’m being gaslit oh nooooo


I took a look at their comments and It’s that alias_qr_rainmaker guy again!


Jesus dude, this is what you’re doing on Christmas eve? 😂


If AI is far better than humans, can you do yourself a favour, go talk to your little robot friends and leave us humans alone?


Gotta be honest, the fact that it feels like every website now asks me if I want to set up a passkey makes me thoroughly, deeply, wholly skeptical of this thing.


Interesting. Thanks for explaining a bit more! Have you always done numerology?


It sounds like some of those ciphers have big overlap, like the reduction ciphers. Do you factor that in when you’re using them? I think another commenter mentioned that using multiple reduction and exception ciphers that exclude letters not used in the phrase you’re analysing will obviously give you the same results, which seems like a good point to me


Guess the bank account was looking a bit empty 🤷♂️


Thanks for those cyphers! Is it common to use a bunch of different ones in numerology? :o
But where’s “hex” coming from? I’m sure other words equal 44 too. Does “hex” equal 44 in the cyphers you use?
When you say that Call of Duty was chosen, what do you mean? He was a developer for that series, and it’s his most popular work so it’s where most people would know him from.


Wait, what’s the “under a hex (44)” from? He was 55.
Also I get 79 for “murder”, where did you get 38? And for “Call of Duty”? I don’t know shit about Numerology honestly lol


Just don’t add the surveillance and spam features in the first place. 👍 Fuck off, Mozilla.


To me, “the music a subcontractor listens to while they work” is different to “the thing they’re working on”.


The GenAI asset was in the final release. It wasn’t that a subcontractor used GenAI to create a music playlist to listen to while they worked. That’s a very different thing.


She is saying a few things.
The first statement is saying that she believes she received the majority of the abuse aimed at the two of them (her and her boss). She is saying that she believes this to be because she’s a woman, and that women generally are criticised more than men for this kind of thing.
The second statement is that, of the abuse she received, most of it came from other women.


You asked people to explain. People explained that you’re coming across as a dick, in a thread explicitly about regrettable, gullible moments. I don’t know what you’re having a problem with here but it seems like you’re the one having an emotional reaction, calling people cowards and refusing to hear people’s explanations.
I think the reason your initial comment comes across hostile is because of the way it’s written (chaining questions), and the way you’re asking things that have an obvious answer.
However, you didn’t write anything explicitly hostile. It’s a question that could come across either way, and if you genuinely had no mocking or hostile intent I would have suggested rereading and rewording your comment to make that clearer, as it’s tough to interpret that kind of thing through text. I’ve totally left comments that read hostile when I didn’t intend it to, it just happens sometimes! 🤷♂️
Where would Mort Garson’s Mother Earth’s Plantasia fit on here? I want to say something like “Meadowcore” but that’s not on the list and Plantasia is certainly not befitting of a punk suffix. Core also feels a bit clunky for it. I like “Treewave”, maybe it’d fit there? Oh, or “Gardencore” would make the most sense I suppose given the concept of the album


The WWE??? I’ve been mostly out of the loop on these two little psychos for like five years or so honestly. Wow, that’s wild.


They both do boxing? I thought Logan did crypto instead of the physical stuff
Oh fuck I’m a bot you got me beeeep boooop list me up