since on both sides there are good people

No, there aren’t. If you are anything other than maximally opposed to the side sending people to concentration camps, then you are a loathesome piece of shit who the world would be better off without.

Can’t lose what you never had.

How could anyone have been expected to know that he was going to behave in exactly the same way he did the last time he was president?

So why are we in this circular firing squad against Democrats?”

Because most of us aren’t here to be Democrats, we’re here to make the country a better place and some of the calls are coming from inside the house.

Many ISPs block some traffic on those ports for residential customers in order to force you to use a much more costly business account to be able to host your own website.

she suggested brioche instead

The fundamental issue is the line was only ever originally attributed to ‘a great princess’ and Antoinette was nine when it was first written by Rousseau. It didn’t become commonly attributed to her until well after her death.

Op literally answered those questions in the post you’re replying to.

Jim Cramer observed

Title had me worried for a sec, as soon as I saw this I knew we’ll be alright.

People used to say Reagan and his courting of the ‘moral majority’ were going to fracture the party and cause it to destroy itself with the embrace of a massively divisive religious rhetoric. It’s wishful thinking at best.

there’s no way the GOP can recover.

I want this to be true, but it just isn’t. A third of the country will follow along with whatever mental gymnastics are required to blame democrats. Another third are just not paying enough attention and vote on pure vibes, if at all. If dems try to run an unlikable, centrist candidate with a mixed at best record it will end up a toss up. And the electorate at large will forget everything that is happening now within eight years.

OK democratic leadership, you win; I’ll quit voting for your party.