epigone

from reading this poem, if you don’t immediately conceive “the swamp” is filled by children’s blood in this admin’s imagination, i don’t know what to tell you.

we cannot all be anything to everybody about anything.

and robot dogs?

people voted for this

metacognitive myopia even prevents people from updating their beliefs about the existence of WMDs.

is this because we’re listening to all that damn “post-hardcore” music on the patios and at the parks in public?

“social media” as buzzword (scientific speech, scientific image) and “social media” as political violence (commercial speech, manifest image) are two different beasts under the empire of law.

i mean, by the grammatical rules, it’s still a valid reply to the comment.

[modifier][noun][verb][modifier][noun].

gödel reminds us: “syntax all on its own cannot determine semantics”.

the point is to evidence grammaticalness despite apparent meaningfulness, and the commenter may just be seeking to simulate the point with a logically consistent application of the rules at play. “incomplete” with respect to [mimicking] or [reproducing] an [socio-historical cultural] artifact, but not inconclusive in evidencing the point (remixing to produce variations on the theme; i.e., there are evidences of +20-word recursive sentences, if not larger).

nothing about the buffalo sentence entails the social rule “when someone else posts the buffalo sentence, it must match the aforementioned sentence verbatim”. permutations on the point are totally fair game.

bullied bullies bully bullied bullies bullying bullied bullies

[narrator]: bill gates did not GET ReST.