wholookshere

there’s a lot more to the article than open source

I think it’s the contradiction of trying to fight censor ship while also praising the US government, who is in a stream of heavy censorship. just look at that 60 min episode.

bush era regulations aren’t foreigners…

here’s the thing with Putin, he didn’t invent the flames, he just stoked them. The tea party was always this.

your quick to blame current problems on foreigners, while ignoring that those people came to the us BECAUSE of its existing imperialistic politics.

They’re at best a symptom of a larger problem.

ignoring the decades of previous history of home made American imperialism.

Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,…

the thing you have to remember is that the internet is built off the backs of furries and trans women.

that’s not to say that all tech workers are one of those two, but a lot of those two work in tech, specifically open source.

Don’t believe me? look up programer/Unix socks.

forgive my snarkiness. its usually the quickest way to this realization.

what has been published by deep seek is the music, not the software, the music.

can you show me the actual source code?

the human readable code, not the weights.

deleted by creator

no,

your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.

source code is what defines open source.

what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.

I really wish there was one better than Gramerly and now this…