Well, so much for scientific research in Antarctica…it’s about to be a war zone.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No matter the advances, the Otto cycle will always be 25% efficient, at most.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Last I heard modern gas engines have reached a smidge over 30% thermal efficiency because the pure Otto cycle hasn’t been used in decades. Mazda(?) recently announced an engine over 40% efficiency using an Atkinson design I think. Superchargers and more Turbochargers boost efficiency more by recycling waste energy.

      But I’m not sure any of that matters because diesels aren’t Otto Cycle.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Such as Wankels, ok, just replace “Otto cycle” with 4-stroke in my original comment.

            • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Then your original comment is still wrong, because diesel engines are significantly more thermally efficient than 25%. Even modern gas engines tend to beat your 25% claim.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I guess we’re not on the same page on what a four-stroke engine is, as only one “stroke” of four is doing actual mechanical work.

                • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  No, we’re on the same page you just haven’t read enough of it. The very article you linked says Otto engines can reach 30% efficiency. It also touches on other 4-stroke engine cycles.