Well, so much for scientific research in Antarctica…it’s about to be a war zone.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Trump’s about to liberate Antarta… Aunt Tart… Antitartica… the place where the polar bears live!

    • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We? Bring them behind the shed in my back yard and ‘we’ won’t have this problem.

      I’d happily eat some long pig to reduce the overabundance of whiny bitches with money.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Hey what is this we? Don’t bring me into this. It’s always the same few assholes at the top doing it all

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Is it not incumbent upon the rest of society to stop a maniac when he threatens to burn everything down? Inaction in the face of evil is complicity. We all need to start organizing for the revolution.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Born too late to die in war over oil, born too early to die in war over oil, born just in time to die in war over oil.

  • excral@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The issue with fossile fuels or more generally oil dependency isn’t the limited availability. It’s that they’re massive deposits of stored carbon and if we start burning them they get released to the atmosphere. With the oil deposits already known if we use them all, we’d have killed the planet long before the last drop of oil is used. We don’t need any new deposits.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The year is 2070. Common daily temps are between 35-45°C. Only 200k humans survive globally, and barely.

    They still use fossil fuels to generate electricity…

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Doesn’t need a lot of oil to upkeep a population of 200k humans though.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A larger nation with a massive population like India or China will unilaterally employ some kind of geoengineering project long before it gets to that level of lost profits.

      Likely it will be some kind of massively risky atmospheric particle seeding to reflect some percentage of sunlight, which could have unknown consequences down the line.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 day ago

      A truce has been reached between the forces of AE-X11 Musk and the virtual consciousness of Jeff Bezos as they vow to unite against the tribal council of the former Russian Federation to secure the remaining oil reserves in the desert plains of the Antarctic continent

    • Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      If there’s only 200K people left, everything is going to be fine … for them.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Human population now being only 0.00025% of its peak, their greenhouse gas emissions are now insignificant, so, the planet is now finally recovering, fast.

      Edit : obviously I’m not a writer.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Maybe, but look at that territory, it’s perfectly positioned to unlock more agriculutural land northward as the world further south burns. I bet the Russian ruling class is eagerly awaiting this scenario that would put them towards the top of the pile in world powers. They may end up in a position to pick and choose from waves of immigrants.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just for context, the US uses around 7 billion barrels per year. Can keep the SUVs going for the better part of a century.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        What’s weird is that Gale Banks, one of the godfathers of turbocharging and a huge name in diesel performance, is adamant that rolling coal is stupid. Especially in modern engines with lightening fast fuel control systems… more forgivable in older diesels with mechanical injection systems. But he says it’s money and horsepower literally blowing out your exhaust, being a internal combustion engine enthusiast myself I don’t understand wanting to leave performance blowing away in the wind; that’s YOUR unburnt diesel blowing away! In THIS economy!

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No matter the advances, the Otto cycle will always be 25% efficient, at most.

          • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Last I heard modern gas engines have reached a smidge over 30% thermal efficiency because the pure Otto cycle hasn’t been used in decades. Mazda(?) recently announced an engine over 40% efficiency using an Atkinson design I think. Superchargers and more Turbochargers boost efficiency more by recycling waste energy.

            But I’m not sure any of that matters because diesels aren’t Otto Cycle.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s almost poetic. The oil got there because there was once vegetation on Antarctica, that decayed over the eons. Now the thirst for oil will lead to heating the planet enough to melt the ice again.