This is what active military serving near Iran get to eat. Is he having door dash granny deliver it?

  • active_rooster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Ironic that the debate is about Iran while the real story is in the tray. US defense budget is bumped up to 1.5 Trillion and yet that’s the return on investment for the people actually doing the deployments.

    Separately worth noting, between institutional investors and billionaire land grabs, the US has lost over 40 million acres of farmland to non-farming ownership in the last decade. These two things are connected: when capital extraction is the priority, everything else, soldiers, food supply, communities, gets the leftovers.

    • Jiral@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      Capital extraction is just one aspect. However, one can get a lot of money from transit oriented development just as well. The problem is, that it is in many places plain illegal to develop in such a way and car oriented development is heavily encoraged by regulatiry means and heavy subsidies. There is also a lack in expertise on all levels, in comoanies but also among authorities, in doin stuff any other way than car-only suburbia.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    So, they sent their navy to the middle East with no plans on establishing or maintaining a supply line?

    This is hilarious levels of incompetence.

  • The things that the usa military can do borderline miricles, which is to be expected given how much of the national budget is poured into it. Deployable burger kings are a real thing, stupid as they are. However, that relies on a foundation of logistics, which requires planning and preparation. Guess what our current leadership is really bad at?

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Maybe consider not fighting for the country known to not give a damn about (combat) veterans

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Still looks better than the shit they feed the kids in public schools. GOP grifters have turned this country into a shithole just like russia.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Am i supposed to be sorry for killers just because they’re government employees?

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      No, you’re supposed to make fun of the US for not being able to maintain a supply line to a war they started themselves.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I have a few questions: Why does that tray look absolutely new? like no scratch marks? I’ve been military, and NEVER saw anything that new.

    Am I to believe a ship the size of a floating city doesn’t have non-perishables to last 5 years at least?

    The ships can’t be resupplied by bog standard container ships from a nearby neutral/friendly country?

    The armed forces that can essentially airlift an entire army within a week can’t airdrop a few hundred pallets on a carrier’s deck? (Nevermind that in the Vietnam war landing a fucking C130 was trialled, on carriers smaller than supercarriers.

    Also, the newer super Hercules y way more powerful, has shorter take off and landing, etc…), never mind that heavy helos can lift 4-5 tons, so 10 Sea Stallions or equivalent can put 40 tons of food on a carrier’s deck within hours.

    The surface under the tray looks suspiciously like a kitchen countertop, but I haven’t seen a carrier mess hall.

    Sorry, but I have a hard time believing it.

    The postal stuff I can understand, as it’s really non essential.

    I’m 110% against the Epstein wars, but this looks iffy.

    • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      https://youtu.be/P0hfSjJksoo At 1:15, I think that’s the mess hall on the USS Tripoli. Maybe they only use table clothes when not at war, or on holidays, or something. I didn’t find what the bare tables look like. Anyways, the trays look similarly new, based on the few shots of them that are clear.

      I’m also very dubious that the problems in the US military are an inability to get things to a place. Could this be a vegan that is not being offered suitable meals, or a joke of some kind?

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m reminded of people making fun of ‘The Art of War’ for having advice like “feed your troops”.

    This is why ‘The Art of War’ was written, for complete morons with no understanding of reality but put in charge of an army.

  • emmmy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    somewhat embarrassing

    no this is 100% mortification levels of embarrassment. you couldn’t make propaganda that effective if you tried.

    • Aneb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well they will just call it a liberal conspiracy, and 50% of Americans will believe them

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The really sad thing- a ground soldier forward deployed on a battlefield eating MRE kits in a trench would get a significantly better meal than this.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even the dreaded “Cheese and Vegetable Omelet” would be better then what was shown. There are not enough calories in that “meal” shown above to do much, let alone operate a war ship.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can only imagine how a soldier must feel like when they get to eat stuff like that, and then they are fighting a war that is so dramatically unpopular at home, and all it seems to do it make everything more expensive.

    I would think retention is going to become a major problem for the US military.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I would think retention is going to become a major problem for the US military.

      If it didn’t stop them in the last decades it won’t bother them now.

  • Insekticus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    Classic military diet at the end of an empire’s reign. The corruption is so deep that the logistics to feeding their invading army while out on deployment are all but collapsed due to communications failures, inefficient funding, being belligerent to the countries who supply you food while abroad, etc.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, try to get something made here anymore, we don’t have the infrastructure to develop a lot of those skills anymore.

      Our entire manufacturing industry rested on its laurels for fifty years. We sort of assumed the miracle was cheap labor (money in America is still upset about whole emancipation thing).

      Super high dollar mossles were the only thing we had left and I think we just realized how the balance of Military power is also shifting.

      So unless we WW3 everyone else, or stir up the continent and get them to do it again, we would have to do serious work and we don’t have those akillsets either. Think about our bave new Iraq.

      Half a century of bad leadership has had an effect.

      • Gathorall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        And industry certainly didn’t have to. Whilst Trump is wrong about the effects of trade deficit, he wasn’t wrong about it posing problems for US. Trade deficit isn’t a bad thing, because if done wisely import is essentially foreign investment in domestic production.

        The fact that US manufacturers struggle is another way Trump represents the US: the US personified is a horrible short-sighted businessman that can’t get ahead with decades of a head start and endless investment pouring in.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Our entire manufacturing industry rested on its laurels for fifty years.

        It didn’t fall asleep, it grew legs and walked overseas.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It didn’t fall asleep, it grew legs and walked overseas.

          Legs that were supplied by Wall Street (at a profit, of course)