• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    the problem is they never check who’s who before they start shooting. there are numerous instances where the person who calls the police for protection is the one who gets shot.

    so your choice is between a stabbing and a shooting. and a stabbing you might be able to run away from.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      this sounds awfully similar to “man or bear”

      just because police are uncompetent pigs who sometimes shoot the caller, doesn’t mean that in the majority of the cases they’ll shoot them.

      And just because you have that 1% risk of getting wrongly shot (could be lower, pulled the number out of my ass) doesn’t mean you should try to face the very real and instant threat of another person trying to stab you.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        that 1% risk

        In the context of the US, i’d say 1% is probably the percentage of actual competent, professional, relatively unbiased cops.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          availability bias, there are so many traffic stops, checkups, calls, etc every day that go just fine and you never hear about, and of those that end in the news, BWCs have proven police right in most cases

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        and just as man vs bear, you have to be very privileged to not get why bear is the popular choice.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            that doesn’t even make sense… having a functioning brain prevents you from understanding why the bear was a popular choice?

                • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  you know, if you have to express your disappointment/disagreement, you don’t have to comment without expanding the conversation further. downvote and move on.

                  • pyre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    nope, a downvote doesn’t convey that you’re awfully embarrassing. which is why I didn’t downvote. also maybe take your own advice