• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s not the $3/month ad free Tubi type service that is the bad part. It is the part where it is attached to Roku. That company has proven the kind of trash they are already.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The same Roku that added mandatory ads to their home screen after selling the product and promising not to do exactly that?

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    not that I’m going to use this service, considering roku’s sleazy history of thrusting ads into anything they build, but looking at the content: eh, lots of solid b material… but half of it has $ next to the title.

    what the fuck is the point of showing you THE CATALOG if half the shit requires more money? I despise this on Amazon as well. If it’s not on the service i’m already subscribed to why the fuck are you cluttering up the UI?

    sure, if people want that, let them turn it on, but by default? scumfucks.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    $2.99 for now

    ad free for now

    This is step 1 of enshittification, offer a product thats cheaper and higher quality than your competition. Once they have a userbase they’ll start tiering their service.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol. Wanted to comment exactly that. Netflix drove me to piracy again after I went legit after 25yrs of piracy. Won’t fall for this streaming-bullshit again. Go fuck yourself. And Netflix was even more worse for everyone outside the US. For the same price of course.

      Nah, piracy never been easier: enter name of movie/series, wait a minute, watch. On all devices, rooted or not, mainstream or not.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        I actually probably spend more on hardware and labour pirating content than I would on multiple streaming services, but at least I don’t pad the profits of enshittified platforms, and can watch what I want when I want.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah sure, for the price of my servers i could probably get all streaming-services together for some years :-) But they’re not just for that. Jellyfin is just one of the services that runs on them. But yes, even if not. Better paying 5x for something like that than netflix et al.

        • triptrapper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Ha, I was doing a similar calculation recently. I think the only subscription I ever paid for was Netflix, and for the others I used family and friends’ accounts. Only replacing Netflix, I haven’t broken even, but considering I pirate content from 5-6 different services, it’s absolutely cheaper.

      • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Me too. They actually made stop being lazy and make a full automated server specifically for this. Netflix was awful too with the buffering.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s a vastly superior experience.

            I don’t have to deal with annoying authentication, no ads, works on everything, all content is available in a single app/user interface.

            Cheap. I split the $40/mo seedbox charge with 3 siblings, we all save on streaming.

            I even have audiobookshelf because I like listening to audiobooks.

            No music yet, I don’t have a good (private tracker) source

              • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I’ve used Usenet, I can see how it would be good for music. Being able to grab individual tracks on demand would be nice.

                What’s the software stack used now? Manual downloading nzbs from index sites? or is there an *arr equivalent?

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I learned my lesson with Netflix, I’ll never stop doing things the better way again.

        I still will never forgive Netflix for pulling a show without warning when I was actively watching it. A problem I never get doing it my way.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      What I find funny about this is that often the quality of the shit on the service decreases as the price continues to rise.

      To see the end state, just check out trying to stream all of the NFL games of an out of market team. It’s like $1000 a year to watch mostly beer and truck ads broken up by thirty minutes of “football”.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is my default mindset now. Anytime I see a relevant “new subscription with great value!”, I just…don’t. Because I already know it won’t last, it’ll get sold or bought out, and everything good about it stripped out and scrapped.

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      24 hours ago

      And then $24.99/mo and no commercial free option ever. Plus they send you spam advertising and sell all your personal data. Cha-ching!

  • oppy1984@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    When I saw the ad for this on my Roku I thought it was just some western channel based on the name and color scheme. It wasn’t until I saw an article about it that I even knew what it was. I looked into it, my thoughts are, terrible branding, terrible marketing, terrible discovery on the website.

    I don’t see anything that I don’t already own that I would want to watch, but since the website search sucks I don’t know if there’s more to see or not.

    Based on all that, I’m not even willing to blow $2.99 one time to see if it gets better in the app because I doubt it will.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m not negative on this. Streaming apps are easy to cancel and move to something else. Roku will probably raise the price someday and when it’s too high, shift off. I checked Roku originals on Wikipedia and they have barely anything significant. A small amount of feature films they have distribution rights to. TV shows, nothing original narrative seems like a hit. Then a bunch of reality shows and like cooking shows.

    They’re a very long way away from being able to get subscribers on the basis of their original content. Not even Sony has a general streaming service and under them are a bunch of hit TV shows and movies along with their decades of back catalog. Not planning to sub but if I’m insanely bored, I can sub for a month and find some old TV show comedy to put in the background

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Roku via telstra bricked by Telstra TV box that I was using to watch mp4 channels on an older set.

    Never trusting that brand again.

    TPB FTW.

  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Jellyfin/Plex with the *Arr stack is still the better option. A little bit of setup, but then blissful ad-free self-hosted streaming.