lemmy.411426
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days ago

Nancy Pelosi Comes Out In Support of Stock Trading Ban After Trump Says He Doesn’t Really Know About It

www.mediaite.com

external-link
message-square
95
link
fedilink
447
external-link

Nancy Pelosi Comes Out In Support of Stock Trading Ban After Trump Says He Doesn’t Really Know About It

www.mediaite.com

Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days ago
message-square
95
link
fedilink
“If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it"
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    She blocked it when it had a chance of passing. Of course she supports it now that she knows it won’t

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pelosi is the poster child (though “child” in this case is woefully inappropriate) for why such a ban is needed.

      If it weren’t for insider trading, she’d be living in a trailer.

      The fact that she’s speaking on the topic at all bespeaks a breathtaking level of arrogance and hypocrisy.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it weren’t for insider trading, she’d be living in a trailer.

        I don’t get what the point of saying stupid shit like this is. She had been speaker of the house for years, and in Congress for decades. Making 170-190k/year. That’s not trailer money. Her husband also was wealthy prior to this.

        Did they abuse her position for personal gain? Yes.

        Would they be poor without it? Fuck no

        Is she the worst offender? Also no, but Republicans refuse to admit their own politicians do the same shit, more blatantly and more often. Do she gets criticism from all angles while Republican politicians get it only from the opposition. Being the most prominent member of the house also gave her advise more visibility.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fix is in then. We know this greedy inside trader doesn’t want that.

    • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      She definitely got some kind of cutout.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Clearly Nancy doesn’t believe in a word that she’s saying. It doesn’t take decades to figure out that you’re getting rich because you have insider knowledge. Which means she knows there’s no chance the legislation would pass, and she’s just grandstanding, and hey that’s better than nothing, so we can give her a golf clap.

    • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s cynical, dishonest, manipulative, and completely unproductive.

      Based on that alone I completely believe that Nancy Pelosi did the math and realized that Democrats could argue for this out loud maybe even vote for it but there’s no chance that it’ll ever happen so it’s a great chance for her to actually do politics with the voters which I thought she had considered beneath her.

  • ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    She already made enough money she can drop it in a fund and let it grow. Not going to affect her.

  • Agrajag@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Of course she doesn’t care now, she’s only a few years away from retiring or dying on the job anyways

    • mriswith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Retire? Oh you’re funny.

      She is 100% planning on dying in office. She’s obviously one those people who are obsessed with leaving a “legacy”. In her mind she’s going to be remember as the first female member of the House and a groundbreaking feminist who made way for others, etc.

      Which would have probably stuck if she’d retired a decade ago. Now she’s going to remembered as a greedy ghoul who intentionally sabotaged other politicians and held back society to enrich herself. This is too little, too late.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        a groundbreaking feminist who made way for others

        Ah, right, he “woman CEO” 1970s bourgeois feminist trope. But experience has now demonstrated that here’s no difference between a male and a female corrupt weasel. Capitalists are still capitalists, and their weasel mouthpieces are still weasels.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yea, I have nothing but disdain for Dianne Feinstein who did great things like 300 years ago and then held on to her position so long that it all got ruined and thrown away.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Feinstein never did anything significant.

        • mriswith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          RBG did the same thing.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            RBG actually did some good, unlike Feinstein. She hung on too long, but it was for honorable reasons, she just didn’t live long enough for the benefits to materlialize.

    • crandlecan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      … and has her coffers more than filled 👍

      • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        She’s really going to get hers and then pull up the ladder behind her, eh? What a boomer.

        • toddestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          She’s actually too old to be a boomer. Pelosi is silent generation.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No, no, the correct meaning of “boomer” apparently is “anyone older than me that I don’t like”

            • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Attempting to explain anything meaningful by referencing generational cohorts is a lazy, useless pastime anyway. It has about as much intellectual rigor and explanatory power as astrology or the theory of humours.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I recently heard some teenager call someone that was Gen Y a “boomer”. IRL.

              Yeah, I actually laughed out loud at that. 🤣

    • Redditsux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is a huge about-face by her. Why couldn’t she have done this when she was still in power?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        95
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Pulling the ladder up behind you and boomer shit, name a more iconic duo.

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          deleted by creator

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        She supported it in 2022: https://www.willmarradio.com/news/politics/pelosis-support-of-bill-banning-congressional-stock-trading-clears-path-forward/article_610170a0-6df6-5a36-b99a-f986756545e2.html

        And in 2019: https://thehill.com/policy/finance/473281-house-passes-bill-to-explicitly-ban-insider-trading/

        And in 2012: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-on-senate-passage-of-stock-act

        But yeah she made money on stock trades, and famously did not support it in 2021. So there’s that. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/15/house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-opposes-banning-stock-buys-by-congress-members.html

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          She stopped supporting it when it had a real chance of passing. Performative progressivism is the Democrat way.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Nah it looks like she was for banning trades using insider trading, and against banning Congress members and their spouses from trading stocks.

            If your husband/wife’s entire career is trading stocks I highly doubt you’d be for such. It’s hypocritical that she would be for it now though. She should have kept her stance that she had in that 2012 article, that increasing scrutiny and verifying their trades should be done to make sure no inside information was used.

        • Gaja0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nuance is always appreciated

      • Agrajag@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        https://www.quiverquant.com/congresstrading/politician/Nancy Pelosi-P000197

        look at her trading history and answer that yourself

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Got Mine, Fuck You.”

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        because this is not how capitalists work, simply put.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I was gonna say, she’s 85 and has insider traded her way to a net worth of ~$250 million. No wonder she’s like yeah fuck it lol.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      she doesn’t care now

      She still cares and if this had a chance to pass shed vote against it

      We’ll see neoliberals claim to want progressive policy now, because they’ll never have to vote on it.

      The same way Republicans spent four years demanding Epstein lists, and now that they can release them they won’t.

    • JavaStack@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Normally I’d agree, but she’s one of the old boomers. She’s planning to stay in power another 15 years.

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, kids these days only care about TikCrafts and their MineToks, so it’s our fault she has to stay in power. If we cared more about governance by the people, for the people, instead of streaming Fartnight, she could learn what skibidi toilet Ohio means from her great-grandkids and know why Democrats lose there.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, she can go F’ herself here. She blocked it last time progressive brought this up and this just more performatory BS from disingenuous Democratic leadership.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    She’s fucking 85. It’s not like it will fuck up her retirement plan or something.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      She’s following the Feinstein Retirement Plan.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s probably the only way to move things forward though. Implement rules that only affect future politicians. Let the current generation have their cake. We can gradually transition to something more sane as they get replaced.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I loathe agreeing with that, but when a political system is so self-serving, that’s the only way.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It wouldn’t have changed her retirement plans when she blocked the last attempt several years ago

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s like Trump saying they should ban pedophilia now that he can’t get it up anymore.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t think he’d down a whole case of coke and as many male “enhancement” pills as he can‽

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        People have actually died from too many enhancement pills…

        ETA https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201412/warning-men-erection-drugs-just-might-kill-you

  • Eh-I@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I bet she tells her undertaker she’s for term-limits.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cool. Also, fuck Nacy Pelosi.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    This can only mean one thing… The market is about to tank and tank hard as fuch.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Typical boomer, pulling the ladder up behind her

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 days ago

      What, for the next generation of unethical legislators?

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        🤣

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Boomer. lol no. Words do have meaning and you’re using that word wrong. She predates the baby boomers, that’s how fucking old she is

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        She’s a fucking vampire, and she predates the Salem witch trials where she thinned out the competition.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        More correctly, she’s actually a part of the silent generation.

        • Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          So that’s why she never spoke out against insider trading

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Huh you’re the third person who said this exact thing

  • pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    lol, she already made her money. I agree with removing it, but that’s a very boomer way of seeing…. “I’ve got mine, so fuck you”.

    • rhvg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump will do crypto, is that covered?

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        If it was itd never pass

  • Notserious@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    By saying she supports it, she knows trump will block it

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is the on-brandest

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Twist: It is actually a total ban on all stock trading thus eliminating stock markets forever.

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t stop, I’m finna chum

      • BootyBuccaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        IMBATUKUM

        • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol without the context of my comment I was just thinking what the fuck is this dude going on about. But you right

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Now that would change things drastically. I would think for the better.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.98K users / day
  • 5.87K users / week
  • 11K users / month
  • 23K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 25.1K subscribers
  • 5.31K Posts
  • 96.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org